September 7, 2009 at 8:32 pm
· Filed under PHEV ·Tagged Plug-in Hybrid
Permalink
July 25, 2009 at 10:30 pm
· Filed under Smart Grid, investing
Permalink
July 12, 2009 at 10:17 am
· Filed under AES, EE/RE Economics, Economics, Politics ·Tagged Green Jobs
Permalink
June 30, 2009 at 11:20 pm
· Filed under AES, Energy efficiency, Investing information, electric grid, investing
Predicting market moves is notoriouslly difficult, but I’m feeling pretty good about my recent efforts.
On October 11, 2008, I stoped being a permabear and said, “the market as a whole now seems to me to be fairly valued.” The S&P 500 closed the previous Friday just below 900; today it closed at 919.32. In the fear that abounded last October, it was a hard call to be even that bullish, bit it seems to have worked out.
On June 2, I said we were near a market peak/ The S&P 500 closed that day at 944.74, and is currently down 3% almost a month later, having only bearly exceeded that number by a fraction of a percent.
Since I’m currently short-term bearish, I’ve started a series of articles not to by now, but to buy when a market decline puts them back on sale. Here are may clean enrgy shopping list articles so far:
Transmission stocks
Energy Efficiency Stocks
Clean Transport Stocks
Why market timing makes sense
Two Landfill Gas and Three Geothermal Stocks
Five Solar Stocks
Permalink
March 29, 2009 at 9:18 pm
· Filed under Energy efficiency
Chevron’s willyoujoinus campaign rubs me the wrong way. What is the message here?
- I will use less energy
- I will bike to work 3 days a year.
- I will leave the car at home more.
- I will use solar power.
- I will reuse things more.
To me, this seems to be saying:
- Taking small steps is enough (3 days a year!!!?)
- Sacrifice is required (leave the car at home, use less energy, spend a lot on solar panels.)
These types of messages undermine energy efficiency. There are many ways to save energy which don’t involve inconvenience, and help your bottom line. For instance, you can now buy a power strip for your TV or computer which switches off all the peripherals when the main electronic device is switched off. If you just set it up to turn off your VCR and DVD players when the TV is off, that will probably be a savings of 50 watts. If the TV is off 18 hours a day vor a year, that’s over 330 kW, or a savings of about $60 in the Northeast, $47 in California, or $33 in Colorado… but the powestrips cost only $25-$40, depending on which version you get… more than a 100% return in one year.
Saving energy does not need to be about sacrifice. I ride the bus out of choice… I’m less likely to get in an accident, and I can get work or reading done in the process. One day they were doing maintenance on the standard diesel that serves my route, and instead the bus was one of the newer hybrids. The ride was much smoother… so RTD saving energy by using a hybrid not only saved the transit district money, it made the passengers more comfortable.
Energy Efficiency is a win-win. When Chevron equates it to sacrifice, everyone loses.
Permalink
March 12, 2009 at 1:53 pm
· Filed under Colorado, Electric Regulation, Energy efficiency, Events, Geothermal energy, Investing information, PV, Politics, Renewable Energy, electric grid, energy storage, investing, photovoltaics ·Tagged American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, ARRA, Colorado
Permalink
Older Posts »